There are a lot of good changes here, but I think we need to be careful about how the bulleted and numbered lists are written. For instance, #291 (comment)

I definitely agree that we need to be careful on the bulleted and numbered lists, and want to make sure we're consistent throughout the spec. Are there set guidelines we're using to determine if something is bulleted or numbered? This is flagged in PR #295 as well as there appear to be some inconsistencies.

Are there set guidelines we're using to determine if something is bulleted or numbered?

I think we try to use numbered (ordered) lists for procedures that need to be performed in the given order, and bulleted (unordered) lists for grouping items and concepts in a way that is more readable than a long paragraph. I'm sure it's a very general guideline, with plenty of flexibility and overlap, and opinions may differ.

One exception I can think of is enumeration. "So-and-so covers these N things:" followed by a list numbered 1 - N.

The STE specification itself has some recommendations for writing vertical lists. I am not terribly familiar with it, but probably a good reference.

There are a lot of good changes here, but I think we need to be careful about how the bulleted and numbered lists are written. For instance, #291 (comment)

I agree with this and the discussion in #291, so hopefully we can get rid of the new semicolons before merging this one.